托福写作真题及解析

　　Do you agree or disagree with the statement: When making major purchase (for example, car or laptop), our decisions can be influenced by different sources of information. Explain how each of the following sources of information can influence your decision.

　　您还可以点击查看2014年托福考试真题汇总查看更多雅思考试真题!

　　以上就是出国留学网为大家整理的最新2014年11月9日托福考试写作真题及答案解析，如果喜欢请按Ctrl+D进行收藏!

　　小编推荐阅读：

...

查看全文

2017年托福综合写作真题及解析(4.1）

05-16

标签： 托福综合写作真题 2017托福写作真题

　　以下是出国留学网编辑为您整理的2017年托福综合写作真题及解析(4.1）：阿卡德王国短期灭亡的原因，供您参考，更多详细内容请点击出国留学网(www.liuxue86.com)查看。

　　重复2014年6月15日及2016年3月13日的考题。

　　阅读主要观点提取：

　　有三个理由可以解释阿卡德王国为什么会在短时间内灭亡。

　　理由一：来自被攻取国家的反抗。阿卡德王国要求被攻取的国家缴纳高额的贡品，这些国家久而久之便不再愿意缴纳高额贡品，并举兵反抗，最终使得阿卡德王国灭亡。

　　理由二：粮食短缺。阿卡德王国的粮食主要来自于北部地区。然而，北部地区在一段时间内遭遇严重干旱，使得粮食无法正常供应，最终使得阿卡德王国灭亡。

　　理由三：遭遇贸易抵制。阿卡德王国和很多国家交易商品，但是交易时利用自身的强大欺压别国。之后，三分之二的国家联合起来抵抗阿卡德王国，导致该国经济颓废，最终灭亡。

　　听力主要观点提取：

　　阅读中的三个理由都不可信。

　　第一，这些被侵占的国家想要成功攻破阿卡德王国，唯有从它的内部进攻。然而，阿卡德王国在建立之初就毁掉了所有的城墙。所以，一旦他们对阿卡德王国展开进攻，很容易就被阿卡德的士兵击败。

　　第二，阿卡德王国的农业技术足以抵抗干旱。它有很好的灌溉技术，可以从远处调水。并且，他们还懂得如何长期存储粮食。所以，即使经历一段时间的干旱，阿卡德王国还是可以有足够的食物赖以生存。

　　第三，阿卡德王国的贸易伙伴总量没有减少。虽然遭遇到一部分国家的抵抗，但是阿卡德王国一直在寻找新的贸易伙伴，东至南亚次大陆，西至地中海。所以，新的贸易伙伴会弥补阿卡德王国经济贸易的损失。

　　2017年4月1日托福综合写作满分范文：

　　The writer puts forward three explanations for why the Akkadian Empire did not last long. However, the professor points out that none of the explanations is convincing.

　　First, as for the rebellions of the conquered city-states, the professor demonstrates that the rebel would not succeed. The only chance that the city-state rebels could successfully resist the central government was they can fight inside the city. But it was impossible because the defensive walls had been destroyed by the empire. So the rebellions would be easily defeated.

　　Second, the professor states that the Akkadians had the ability to solve the ba...

查看全文

托福TPO1综合写作真题及解析

08-22

标签： 托福作文托福综合写作托福综合写作真题

　　我们常常将独立作文放在了首要位置，而对综合作文稍有忽略，但是实际上，综合作文也是占到了作文总分30分里面的50%的分值。不要等成绩出来后才发现综合作文的limited 或者fair 极大的影响了自己的分数。所以出国留学网小编为你准备了《托福TPO1综合写作真题及解析》，希望能对你的托福考试能有所帮助。

　　托福TPO1综合写作真题、音频及解析

　　Reading Part:

　　In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day.

　　However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates.

　　If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, so...

查看全文